🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, and block by block. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, where the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously backed Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.