🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.